Caroline abdicates as Green Leader – Andrew Cooper ?

Two years ago everybody said “Caroline’s election mustn’t be a coronation”. But it was. I think Caroline Lucas’s strategy all along was to give Jonathan Bartley an assured opportunity to show what he was capable of, and then go back to being a sole Green MP – more than a full time job.

Jonathan has indeed established himself as competent – a safe pair of hands. He is media savvy, and lives in London. I believe he would have steadily built up both his own and the Green Party’s credibility.

Would have.

If either Caroline or Jonathan have misgivings about the strategy they publicly endorsed at the Bournemouth conference earlier this year they have chosen to hide them. It is in denial of the reason the Green vote collapsed from 1.111.603 in 2015 to 525,435 in 2017.

In 2015 we achieved several quite startling second places, but they were al in seats where voters could be sure that Labour would win. The clear message – to the Labour hierarchy – was “The Green Party is a better socialist party than the moribund one led by Ed Miliband”.

I confess, I too was taken by surprise not just by the emergence from nowhere of Jeremy Corbyn, but by the sheer size of his support, and his subsequent resounding re-endorsement. though with hindsight, it simply confirms the above message. Whilst I question Corbyn’s abilities as a leader, his skills as a campaigner are not in doubt. Once it became obvious that under Corbyn, Labour was going to do much better in 2017 than had seemed possible when the election was called, the Green Party’s fate was sealed. This is not wisdom after the event. I campaigned in the Isle of Wight because that was the Green Party’s best 2015 result in a Conservative seat.

I keep trying to point out in this weblog how the Green Party can, and can has now become must attract Conservative, or t least Lib Dem voters who look askance at socialism. We can do so without sacrificing either social justice or Green principles. As I say It is all somewhere in this blog, but two cardinal points are that in return for less taxation of the rich than the 1940s we might just preserve the ecosphere, and the basic income, far from being a scroungers’ charter, makes work pay better than the Universal Credit and gives potential entrepreneurs a springboard.

But Caroline, excellent as she is at what she does on behalf of the Green Party, is a Socialist. She cannot bear to think of Labour other than at least as allies, if not friends, against a common enemy. I agree that that common enemy is abominable, but I can see why the Labour Party regard Greens as at best as fleas sucking their life-blood, and at worst as potential vampires. Caroline, if we are ever to oust that common enemy, we have to take votes from them. An alliance of everybody else will not work.

Far from building on the outstanding 2017 Isle of Wight result, the current Green Party strategy completely ignores it, presumably with Caroline’s approval. But what will Jonathan Bartley do once he can be his own man? Up to now he has stuck to Caroline’s hymn sheet. Left to his own devices will he revert to his pragmatism as part of John Major’s team? I am afraid the current socialist complexion of the Green Party membership may loom larger for him than the need to change course.

I am assuming that Bartley will stand for Leader. and will be popular. Fine, but that means there must be a female and a male as deputies. I shall not be standing for either post. But I shall be extremely disappointed if Andrew Cooper does not apply for one or the other. He was the top male candidate for Deputy Leader in 2016. Here is what I said then about Andrew when I was musing on whether to stand as leader:

Andrew Cooper’s record is formidable – 16 [now 18] years as a Kirklees councillor. He has a firm grasp of the original Limits genesis of the Green Party.  He has applied this approach locally making pragmatic arrangements as appropriate, and he has shown this understanding in speeches.

I see there have already been hits on my blog on 16th June 2016, on whether I should stand for the leadership. Here is the (slightly amended) narrative, also from my blog 2 years ago as the Green Party’s raison d’être if it is to reassert itself as a meaningful political force.

  • We are in danger of exceeding the Earth’s capacity to cope
  • This is now embodied in the Paris Climate Change Agreement [Dec 2015]
  • All other issues pale into insignificance, and will become impossible [if economic activity is not restrained]
  • This involves what will be called a recession [less serious than the one predicted by Limits to growth, but  a recession none the less]
  • If the pie is less than we thought, it will have to be shared – redistribution. [This is why we fell into the ‘socialist’ trap]
  • The Citizens’ Basic Income is the best way to achieve this
  • It is in any case an answer to this government’s nasty benefit sanctions regime [and the Universal Credit fiasco]

 

6 responses to “Caroline abdicates as Green Leader – Andrew Cooper ?

  1. I see Andrew is standing for Deputy. Where does that leave your very sensible position?

    It seems that nobody will be articulating the need to change strategy (or at least the Frame through which we present our vision to voters) and things will continue as normal.

    This is an opportunity to change direction, but I think we won’t have that option….

    • Simple: Vote Cooper.
      The Bournemouth conference was poorly attended due to the weather, so not really representative, but too many there for my tiny hand to get noticed. It is worrying though that no one who did get called saw it as I did.

  2. Clive, Have you read Lost Connections by Johann Hari (2018)? Chapter 22 includes an account of the 1970s Canadian gov UBI experiment in Dauphin, Manitoba. It focuses on positive outcomes for mental health, as that is the subject of the book.

    • I knew about the Dauphin Minincome scheme anyway, but earlier this year at a UBI conference at the LSE I heard Evelyn Forget no less give an acount of it.
      I am tearing my hair out at perceived obstacles to the UBI, which boil down to vested iterests on one side, and failure to see the wood for the trees on the other.
      Johan Hari – now there’s a name to conjure with. His articles in the Independent were just too hard hitting. I think it was the one where he said the then Pope should be facing interrogation in a police cell over child sex abuse that got him bounced out on some pretext. Where is he now? I need him to read this blog.

  3. What a pity that after 44 years of existence the Green Party mantra to save the planet has received scant attention. Maybe it could be what our governments have concentrated on has been the problem. On Tuesday morning I listened to the Radio 4 LifeScientific program where Jim Al-Khalili interviewed an eminent inventor who made several very successful businesses as well as bringing up his children – without ever borrowing money to start up. His answer to Al-Khalili’s final questerion, are we now seeing less inventions? “Yes, unfortunately financial gain has taken over invention”. And I believe the same applies to health, education, arts, farming etc. – in fact every aspect of our humanity. Profits rule so where or how does humanity stand?

    • Thank you Branda. I think you will find a part of the answer to why finance is stifling invention in my ‘Page’ on the Tragedy of the commons – inventions get financed whist growth is posssible, but inventions – even ones wich might save the ecosphere – don’t get financed if they are not thought likely to make a profit.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.